http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:53:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/#comment-1128 Mark Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:27:36 +0000 http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/#comment-1128 Obviously the signing of Bradley will likely mean that Matt Cooke was nothing more than a rental. I am OK with that. Brads did a helluva job, is a veteran leader and fits on the checking line real well. Let's just hope that Brooks Laich will rejoin him. Obviously the signing of Bradley will likely mean that Matt Cooke was nothing more than a rental. I am OK with that. Brads did a helluva job, is a veteran leader and fits on the checking line real well. Let’s just hope that Brooks Laich will rejoin him.

]]> http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/#comment-954 Mark aka Usually Frustrated Caps Fan Sat, 31 May 2008 23:10:29 +0000 http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/#comment-954 I agree with faux no problem with this deal at all. Good, solid, roster player, easily worth 1.8% of your salary cap if you're the GM. I agree with faux no problem with this deal at all. Good, solid, roster player, easily worth 1.8% of your salary cap if you’re the GM.

]]> http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/#comment-935 Fauxrumors Thu, 29 May 2008 16:58:17 +0000 http://www.capsblueline.com/2008/05/28/528-141-am-capitals-re-sign-matt-bradley/#comment-935 1) Have no problem with the terms. The length is a year longer than what we would have given, but 1 mil these days for any roster player isn't too bad. 1) Have no problem with the terms. The length is a year longer than what we would have given, but 1 mil these days for any roster player isn’t too bad.

]]>